Clinical Foundations
Webinar Series

 

Protecting the Ventilated Patient from
Hospital-Acquired Infections

David Vines, MHS, RRT, FAARC

Our Mission

As our aging population grows, so does the prevalence of respiratory-related ailments. To meet this medical need, a variety of new respiratory diagnostic and treatment options are being developed. With the availability of these new options, respiratory care professionals will require the most up-to-date, scientifically- and clinically-based information to help them make informed decisions on what is best for their patients.

 

Clinical Foundations provides practical, clinically- and evidenced-based articles, case studies and symposia for respiratory therapists and respiratory care directors, managers, and supervisors. Clinical Foundations is based on a patient-focused model of care that emphasizes the need to provide the care and services that focus on patients’ individual needs and preferences.

 

As part of our commitment to helping respiratory care professionals improve their skills, each edition of Clinical Foundations is fully accredited by the AARC for CRCEs.

 

Advisory Board

Richard Branson, MS, RRT, FAARC

Professor of Surgery

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Cincinnati, OH

 

Kathleen Deakins, MS, RRT, NPS

Supervisor, Pediatric Respiratory Care

Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital of University Hospitals

Cleveland, OH

 

William Galvin, MSEd, RRT, CPFT, AE-C, FAARC

Program Director, Respiratory Care Program

Gwynedd Mercy College,

Gwynedd Valley, PA.

 

Carl Haas, MS, RRT, FAARC

Educational & Research Coordinator

University Hospitals and Health Centers

Ann Arbor, MI

 

Richard Kallet, MSc, RRT, FAARC

Clinical Projects Manager

University of California Cardiovascular Research Institute San Francisco, CA

 

Neil MacIntyre, MD, FAARC

Medical Director of Respiratory Services

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, NC

 

Tim Myers, BS, RRT-NPS

Pediatric Respiratory Care

Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital

Cleveland, OH

 

Tim Op’t Holt, EdD, RRT, AE-C, FAARC

Professor, Department of Respiratory Care and Cardiopulmonary Sciences University of Southern Alabama

Mobile, AL

 

Helen Sorenson, MA, RRT, FAARC

Assistant Professor, Dept. of

Respiratory Care

University of Texas Health Sciences Center

San Antonio, TX

Current Issue

 

Aerosol Therapy for Ventilator-Dependent Patients:

Devices, Issues, Selection & Technique

Arzu Ari, PhD, RRT, PT, CPFT, FAARC

 

Many types of aerosol devices for delivering inhaled therapeutics are available for treating mechanically ventilated patients. Each type of device has advantages and disadvantages, which are discussed in this article. Many variables must be accounted for to optimize the technique of delivery and the amount of medication administered. It begins with choosing the right device based on the medication to be administered, knowing what particle size will be produced over what period of time, then determining how aspects of mechanical ventilation will affect medication delivery and deposition. Intermittent versus continuous nebulization, the nebulizer type, the type of spacer and its electrostatic charge, and the aerosol device’s position in the ventilator circuit all affect the efficiency of aerosol delivery. Ventilator parameters, including flow rate, pressurization, and features like the presence of a heat-moisture exchanger also affect medication delivery. In addition, correct patient positioning can improve treatment efficacy and response.

 

 

Panel Discussion: Aerosol Therapy In Spontaneously Breathing & Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Description, Selection & Issues

 

Moderator: Tim Myers, RRT-NPS, MBA, FAARC

Panelists: Ariel Berlinski, MD, Bruce Rubin, MD, MEngr, MBA, Rajiv Dhand, MD, FCCP, FACP, FAARC

 

Many issues surround the selection and use of aerosol therapy in all populations of patients. Matching the medication to the delivery device is key, as is understanding how the mechanistic attributes of nebulizers and mechanical ventilation can work together or against each other in delivering medication effectively. Each nebulizer option offers advantages and disadvantages that need to be assessed according to patient need, the medication involved, and use with mechanical ventilation (if present). Aerosol therapy for pediatric patients poses a unique set of challenges. Standards of practice are still evolving regarding minimizing the risk ventilator-associated pneumonia with aerosol treatments. Adherence to treatment regimens is a global issue that encompasses patient perceptions, patient/family education, financial concerns, insurance reimbursement, and other factors. Our panel of experts discusses a patient-focused approach to aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated and spontaneous breathing patients.

 

 

This program is sponsored by Teleflex

Clinical Foundations is published quarterly by Saxe Healthcare Communications.

 

Please direct your correspondence to:

Saxe Healthcare Communications

P.O. Box 1282

Burlington, VT 05402

sshapiro@saxecommunications.com

Fax: (802) 872-7558